ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Valorization of algal biomass for sustainable biofuel production: cultivation to commercialization.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microalgae have been recognized as attractive feedstocks for advanced biofuels because of their relatively high photosynthetic efficiency, short doubling time, and ability to secrete a range of energy-rich molecules that do not involve agricultural land or food resources. Considerable advances have been made in the past two decades in strain improvement, cultivation technology, and conversion processes; nevertheless, large-scale commercialization has been held back by various biological, technological, and economic bottlenecks. Although microalgal biofuels hold considerable potential for source renewable energy in near future, there exists a significant gap between laboratory discovery and economic viability. This review attempts to offer a critical overview of the current state of microalgal biofuels, contradicting that the key to future viability does not lie in optimization of a particular technique, but in the strategic integration of biological advances (such as strain development) and engineering solutions, as well as enabling policies in the market domain. The examining of the interplay of these concepts depicts that future research must focus on stabilizing strains in outdoor environments and developing efficient, low-energy methods of harvesting to close the productivity gap. It also predicts that future economic viability will depend on a multi-product biorefinery approach for development of biofuel, in order to subsidize the industry until policy and carbon markets can support a large-scale industry focused solely on biofuel development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42007999What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.