ArticlePloS one2026
Distributions of plantar loads are altered when walking in anxiety-inducing virtual settings but not under cognitive demand.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additional cognitive load and fall-related anxiety alter balance and locomotor control, independent of motor demands. Exposing participants to virtual elevation increases perceived cost of falling, and individuals alter the distribution of medial and lateral plantar loading to maintain balance and avoid a lateral postural threat (in virtual reality). Here, we extend this prior work to examine anterior and posterior loading in response to cognitive demand and virtual elevation to induce anxiety. We predicted that the distribution of plantar loads between the medial and lateral, and anterior and posterior compartments of in-shoe load sensors would indicate within-step changes to locomotor balance control across walking conditions. Healthy participants (N = 16) were pseudorandomized into single- or dual-task trial blocks first. While wearing a head-mounted virtual-reality display and in-shoe load sensors, participants walked at self-selected pace overground on a 40 cm wide by 5.2 m long walkway at virtual high and low elevation during single and dual-tasks. For dual-tasking, participants walked and talked extemporaneously about a randomly selected topic. All participants wore their own footwear. The distribution of medial and lateral and anterior and posterior loads was computed across normalized stance. Statistical parametric mapping determined significant differences in plantar load distribution by walking condition. Fall-related anxiety led to a more medial load distribution during 11% to 75% of stance and more posterior distribution during heel strike from 0% to 4% of stance. There were no load distribution changes due to the extemporaneous speech dual-task. Walking at high virtual elevation, not during a dual-task, led to a medial shift in plantar load during stance, and more posterior loading during initial contact. Plantar load distributions were primarily adjusted within-steps to avoid lateral postural threats when step width was constrained by a narrow path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.