SynthesisPloS one2026
Global folate deficiency among adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescents have higher nutrient requirements than adults, as this stage accounts for approximately 40% of total adult weight gain, 45% of skeletal mass and about 15% of adult height. Adequate micronutrient intake is particularly essential for adolescent girls to support growth, reproductive health, and cognitive development. Adolescent folate deficiency disrupts hematopoiesis, causing megaloblastic anemia, and hinders growth, cognition, and immune function and becoming a major public health concern.
objectiveThis global systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address the gap in comprehensive evidence on the prevalence of adolescent folate deficiency.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, HINARI, Science Direct, DOAJ, Google, and Google Scholar for studies reporting the prevalence of folate deficiency among adolescent girls up to August 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE. Pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q and I² statistics. Publication bias was evaluated through visual inspection of funnel plots and Egger's regression test, and adjusted estimates were calculated using the trim-and-fill method. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of pooled estimates.
resultsThe search strategy identified 1,498 records, of which 26 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled global prevalence of folate deficiency among adolescent girls was 26.9%(95% CI: 20.5-33.2), with substantial heterogeneity observed between studies (I² = 99.99%, p < 0.001). On average across included studies, approximately one-quarter of adolescent girls were classified as folate deficient, though the true prevalence varied markedly between settings.. The pooled prevalence of folate deficiency among adolescent girls varied across regions, with the highest rate observed in Africa at 35.5%.
conclusionThese findings revealed folate deficiency as a substantial global public health concern among adolescent girls with a disproportionately high burden in low-resource settings. Region-specific strategies are urgently needed to prevent folate deficiency among adolescent girls, particularly in low-resource settings. Implementing targeted nutritional interventions and public health policies is essential to reduce its associated health consequences in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.