ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau217 levels measured with different assays for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) has been recommended as a biomarker for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated the diagnostic and differential performance of plasma p-tau217 levels measured with three novel assays in a Chinese population. A total of 233 participants were recruited, including 39 cognitively unimpaired controls (CUCs), 28 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, 57 individuals with AD dementia (ADD), 70 individuals with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD), and 39 individuals with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Plasma p-tau217 levels were measured using one assay based on single-molecule techniques (DiSMS), one assay based on digital ELISA (LyMedivh™ AXL), and one assay based on flow cytometry (CBA), as well as a reference assay (ALZpath Simoa). Group differences in plasma p-tau217 levels were assessed using analysis of covariance, and the diagnostic and differential performance of the assays was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic analysis. Partial correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations between the measurements of the three novel assays and those of the reference assay. We found that plasma p-tau217 levels measured with all three novel assays were higher in the ADD group than in the CUC, SIVD, and FTLD groups (all p < 0.05) and effectively discriminated ADD patients from both CUCs and non-AD dementia patients. The diagnostic and differential performances did not significantly differ among the three assays (all p > 0.05). Both the DiSMS and LyMedivh™ AXL assays also revealed elevated plasma p-tau217 levels in the MCI group compared to the CUC group. Moreover, the measurements of the three novel assays demonstrated significant correlations with the ALZpath Simoa measurements (p < 0.01). When using their optimal cutoff values, both the DiSMS and LyMedivh™ AXL assays yielded a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 94.4%, and the CBA assay showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 88.9%. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the diagnostic and differential abilities of plasma p-tau 217 levels measured with three novel assays that can serve as potential alternatives to the currently available testing methods for AD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.