ArticleScientific reports2026
HCV RNA quantification using the Cobas Plasma Separation Card as an alternative to EDTA plasma: a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simplified diagnostic approaches are needed to eliminate hepatitis C by 2030. This prospective multicenter study evaluated dried plasma spots collected with the Cobas® Plasma Separation Card (PSC) versus conventional ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection and quantification using Cobas HCV (nucleic acid amplification test). Cobas PSCs were spotted with finger prick-collected capillary (PSC capillary) or venous (PSC venous) blood from individuals with known HCV infection status. HCV infection status was based on anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in EDTA plasma. The threshold for clinical sensitivity/specificity was 1000 IU/mL RNA. Quantitative HCV RNA results were compared between EDTA plasma and Cobas PSC samples. Among 224 subjects, 119 had undetectable and 105 had detectable HCV RNA. Clinical sensitivity and specificity versus EDTA plasma were 100% for PSC capillary, and 97.8% and 100%, respectively, for PSC venous. HCV viral loads from PSC capillary and PSC venous were comparable with EDTA plasma. Cobas PSC combined with Cobas HCV showed good diagnostic accuracy versus EDTA plasma; quantitative HCV RNA results were comparable between the two sample types. Cobas PSC sample collection may obviate the need for venipuncture and help to broaden the reach of HCV testing in remote or under-resourced regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.