ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
Sexual and urinary outcomes of minimally invasive surgical therapies for LUTS/BPH: a narrative review.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and is frequently associated with erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction. Although transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains an effective treatment for symptom relief, its negative impact on sexual function has driven increasing interest in minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) that aim to preserve sexual outcomes. This narrative review summarizes contemporary evidence on urinary and sexual outcomes following major MISTs, including iTIND™, UroLift™, Rezum™, Aquablation, transperineal laser ablation (TPLA), prostatic artery embolization (PAE), and the drug-coated balloon system Optilume BPH™. Across studies, most modalities demonstrated reductions in the International Prostate Symptom Score of 7.8-17 points and improvements in maximum urinary flow rate of 3-12 mL/s, though the magnitude of effect and durability varied. UroLift™ and TPLA consistently demonstrated strong ejaculation-sparing effects, owing to their non-ablative or highly selective mechanisms. Rezum™ and Aquablation provided durable symptom relief with low rates of de novo erectile dysfunction and mostly transient ejaculatory changes. PAE offered excellent sexual preservation but comparatively less pronounced urinary improvements. Early data on Optilume BPH™ suggest sustained LUTS/BPH improvement with reliable maintenance of sexual function. MISTs represent established alternatives to TURP; however, given heterogeneity in study populations, follow-up durations, and outcome definitions, conclusions should be interpreted cautiously.
Identifiers
42009774What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.