Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009779›Full record

ReviewNature structural & molecular biology2026

Cracking the code of native amyloid fibrils: advances and next steps to enable pathology-informed therapeutic and diagnostic.

Hilal A Lashuel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hilal A LashuelWeill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar. hil4001@qatar-med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-8320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy studies on amyloid fibrils formed by different proteins and isolated from the brains of persons with neurodegenerative diseases have consistently shown that their core structure is distinct from that of fibrils formed by the same proteins in cell-free systems. Attempts to replicate brain-derived amyloid fibrils in vitro have thus far fallen short of faithfully reproducing their structure, post-translational modifications and pathological properties. Whether this discrepancy is a major contributing factor to the poor clinical translation of antiamyloid therapies and diagnostics remains uncertain, partially because the structure of amyloid fibrils formed in the commonly used preclinical models remains unknown. This article presents (1) an overview of recent advances and progress toward reproducing disease-relevant pathological aggregates in vitro and in preclinical models of neurodegenerative diseases; (2) an experimental strategy to determine the structure of fibrils from these models; and (3) recommendations for optimizing their use to bridge the translational gap and support the development of more effective therapies. Establishing that the process of fibrillization and inclusion formation can be faithfully recapitulated in preclinical models is also crucial for enhancing their translational relevance and to guide the development of disease-relevant diagnostics and therapeutics. Until native fibrils can be produced at scale, the choice of which type of fibril preparation to use should be guided by the specific research question and intended application as different applications may warrant different levels of biochemical and structural similarity to disease-derived fibrils.

Indexed as

AmyloidNeurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsBrainCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmyloid

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.