ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2026
Development and Internal Validation of a Prognostic Model for Delayed Ambulation Recovery After Major Abdominal Surgery in Northwest Ethiopia. A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed ambulation recovery following major abdominal surgery presents a significant prognostic challenge, contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Despite recommendations advocating early mobilization, many patients, especially in low-resource settings, experience delayed recovery, and practical risk prediction models are lacking to identify high-risk patients to implement targeted interventions and personalized care.
objectiveTo develop and internally validate a prognostic model predicting delayed ambulation recovery on postoperative day one after major abdominal surgery.
methodsA prospective follow-up study was conducted on 645 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between April to July 2025. Data were collected by Kobo Toolbox and analyzed using R software version 4.4.3. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression were used for model development. Model performance was evaluated via Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC), calibration plots, and Hosmer–Lemeshow tests. Internal validation was done via bootstrapping. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis, and results were presented in a nomogram.
resultsDelayed ambulation recovery was observed in 48.4% (95%CI: 44.5–52.2) of patients. The model identified ten predictors (comorbidity, pain, NG tube, drain, general anesthesia, lower abdominal surgery, fluid amount > 2000 ml, blood loss > 500 ml, surgical duration > 2 h and open surgery). The model shows strong discrimination with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.209). Internal validation revealed AUC of 0.84, with minimal overfitting. The model yielded sensitivity of 79.4%, specificity of 82.6%, and overall accuracy of 81.2%( 95% CI: 78%, 84%). The decision curve analysis offers greater net benefit than treating all or none across a wide range of risk thresholds probabilities.
conclusionA practical prognostic model was developed using easily accessible clinical and surgical predictors and displayed in a nomogram. The model demonstrated a good predictive ability for delayed ambulation recovery after major abdominal surgery. Applying the model helps clinicians with perioperative screening and targeted management of surgical patients in this population. We recommend that other researchers to externally validate the model for transportability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.