ArticleScientific reports2026
Haze-protective self-care behaviours in Sarawak, Malaysia: a state-representative cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transboundary haze is a recurrent hazard in Borneo that elevates particulate exposure to health-relevant levels. We conducted a community-based cross-sectional survey of adults across Sarawak, Malaysia, using multistage sampling (n = 481) to assess haze-related protective self-care behaviours during haze. The primary outcome was a Likert-based self-care index categorised into Poor/Moderate/Good using sample quartiles. Determinants included haze tolerance score (as operationalised in this study), political trust, perceived costs, haze knowledge, and community resilience, alongside sociodemographic and access indicators. Analyses included zonal comparisons and proportional odds regression with sensitivity analyses using multinomial regression and the continuous self-care score. Only 25.6% achieved good self-care, while 49.3% were moderate; self-care differed by zone, with the Northern zone scoring highest despite lower trust/knowledge profiles. In adjusted ordinal models, proximity to a health facility was associated with a higher self-care category (OR 3.38, 95% CI 2.17-5.27; p < 0.001), while unmarried status was associated with a lower category (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.82; p = 0.007). Higher tolerance score (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28; p < 0.001) and haze knowledge (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.30; p = 0.001) were positively associated, whereas community resilience showed a small inverse association (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.013). These findings underscore the importance of actionable know-how and practical access to support higher self-care categories. A trigger-based playbook linking API/PM2.5 thresholds to behaviourally specific messaging and provision of effective respirators and clean-air options warrants evaluation to strengthen population protection during seasonal haze.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.