ArticleNature aging2026
Repurposing drugs for the prevention of vascular dementia using evidence from drug target Mendelian randomization.
Article in Nature aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a devastating cerebrovascular disease with no disease-modifying treatments. Repurposing drugs for known risk factors could have clinical impact. Using Mendelian randomization, we proxied 46 lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory drug effects across five VaD outcomes: clinical diagnosis (N = 7,009 cases, N = 899,672 non-cases/controls) and neuroimaging features (max N = 50,559), white matter hyperintensity volume, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and lacunar stroke diagnosis. Beta-1 adrenergic receptor indicated potential benefit (clinical diagnosis: odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-1.01; white matter hyperintensity volume: estimated causal effect = -0.03, 95% CI = -0.07-0.00; mean diffusivity: estimated causal effect = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.37-0.00; lacunar stroke: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80-1.03). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition suggested increased VaD risk (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.24). Findings remained largely null after multiple-testing correction. Here we show that although little evidence supported repurposing most lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory drugs for VaD prevention or treatment, beta-1 adrenergic receptor antagonism could be a promising repurposing candidate, but replication is needed as further data becomes available. Pharmacovigilance studies should examine angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors' potential to increase risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.