ArticleNature medicine2026
Cibisatamab and FAP-4-1BBL in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer: a phase 1b trial.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts: therapeutic strategies, translational challenges, and future perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Next-generation antibody-based therapeutics in cancer: antibody-drug conjugates bispecific antibodies across hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Spatial ecotype in tumor immune exclusion: from spatial architecture to therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: evolution of structural formats and co-targeting strategies from wet-lab to AI-driven in silico modeling.Cancer letters · 2026Review
- Integrating health equity into energy transitions and climate governance.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Bispecific antibodies in gastrointestinal cancers: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Next-generation T cell engagers for cancer and autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated cibisatamab, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-directed CD3 T cell-engaging bispecific antibody, in combination with FAP-4-1BBL, a fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted 4-1BB ligand providing tumor-localized co-stimulation, in an open-label phase 1b dose-escalation study in patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progressing after two or more prior therapies. Patients received cibisatamab with escalating doses of FAP-4-1BBL weekly or every 3 weeks after obinutuzumab pretreatment to mitigate anti-drug antibody formation. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and biomarker analyses. Among 52 treated patients, the combination showed a manageable safety profile. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2 out of 52 patients (3.8%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 30 out of 52 patients (57.7%; grade ≥3: 2 out of 52, 3.8%) and was manageable; after a cycle 1 cibisatamab dose reduction to 60 mg, serious CRS occurred in 4 out of 27 patients (14.8%; grade ≥3: 0 out of 27). Gastrointestinal toxicities consistent with CEA-directed T cell engagement were observed. Colitis occurred in 7 out of 52 patients (13.5%), including immune-mediated enterocolitis and one fatal cytomegalovirus colitis. No maximum tolerated dose of FAP-4-1BBL was established. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 7 out of 52 patients (13.5%). Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated systemic immune activation, including increased IFNγ, soluble CD25, soluble 4-1BB (CD137) and activated, proliferating CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.