ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of hemoadsorption on plasma catecholamine levels: an in vitro study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoadsorption with polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PS-DVB)-based adsorbents is explored as an adjunctive extracorporeal therapy in selected critically ill patients with dysregulated systemic inflammation. However, such therapy must not interfere with standard treatments, including antimicrobial therapy and hemodynamic stabilization with vasoactive drugs. As catecholamines are rarely quantified analytically in clinical practice, there are currently no studies reporting actual plasma levels during hemoadsorption. This in vitro study evaluated whether hemoadsorption with PS-DVB-based adsorbents alters plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dobutamine. Miniaturized PS-DVB adsorbers were used in 300-minute experiments; serial plasma samples were quantified, and apparent plasma clearance was derived from concentration-time data. Epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations remained essentially unchanged over 300 min, with very low apparent plasma clearance (< 5 mL/min), indicating no meaningful removal under the tested conditions. By contrast, dobutamine demonstrated consistent, measurable clearance (approximately 5–15 mL/min), indicating non-negligible adsorption. Under these in vitro conditions, PS-DVB hemoadsorption did not materially remove epinephrine or norepinephrine but produced measurable removal of dobutamine. These findings are compatible with observational reports of reduced overall vasopressor requirements during hemoadsorption, while highlighting the potential for dobutamine underexposure. Future clinical studies should directly measure therapeutic plasma levels – particularly for dobutamine – during PS-DVB hemoadsorption and assess whether dosing adjustments are required to maintain intended inotropic effects without compromising safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.