ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
The role of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index in predicting mortality risk in critically ill patients with sepsis: a machine learning model in a cohort study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe TyG index has been associated with mortality. However, its predictive value for death in critically ill septic patients remains unclear. Thus, this study aims to investigate the role of the TyG index in predicting mortality among critically ill septic patients.
methodsThe data source was MIMIC- IV 3.0 and Zibo Central Hospital. After the inclusion exclusion process, 6445 patients with sepsis from the intensive care unit remained. The outcome variables were death in hospital death and death within one year of discharge. For two outcomes, four machine learning algorithms were employed to construct models, including linear models, ensemble tree models, gradient boosting tree models, and neural network models. The performance of the models is assessed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, the importance of the TyG index is evaluated by plotting the feature importance ranking of variables selected by each model. DISCUSSION: Among the sepsis patient in-hospital death prediction models, the Random Forest model demonstrated the highest internal validation prediction accuracy, with an average AUC of 0.778, and the TyG index was ranked 11th in feature importance. For the prediction of death within one year after discharge from sepsis, the Random Survival Forest model also performed better, with an average AUC of 0.776, and the TyG index was ranked 3th in feature importance. Our study found that the TyG index was more important in predicting death one year after discharge than in predicting in-hospital death. We suggest that the role of the TyG index should be emphasized when predicting the risk of long-term mortality, with attention to the differences between different prediction models. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.