ArticleBMC nephrology2026
DASH diet, Reduced Rank Regression Dietary Patterns and relations with kidney function in the CHRIS general population study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined effects of diet and genetic predisposition on kidney function outcomes.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing public health concern, closely linked to aging and chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. Diet is a modifiable risk factor for kidney function, but evidence on how specific dietary patterns (DPs) relate to kidney health in healthy populations remains limited. To address this, we evaluated associations between DPs and kidney function, considering sex and menstrual status. DPs were derived using both an a priori approach (DASH) and a hybrid method (RRR), capturing established dietary recommendations as well as population-specific behaviours relevant to kidney health.
methodsWe analysed cross-sectional data from 6133 healthy adult participants of the Cooperative Health Research In South Tyrol (CHRIS) study. Participants self-reporting previous diagnoses of any kidney disease, hypertension, or diabetes were excluded. Using self-reported food frequency questionnaire data, we derived the DASH-score and two RRR-based sex-specific DP-scores based on nine cardio-renal-metabolic parameters. We applied sex-stratified linear and non-linear models to examine associations with creatinine-based eGFR, including interaction and stratified analyses by menstrual status in females.
resultsIn males, a DP reflecting high intake of cereals, whole grains, sugar, fruits, and legumes, and low intake of beer, red and processed meat was associated with higher eGFR levels (β = 0.75, p = 0.0001). Similarly, higher adherence to the DASH diet was also positively associated with eGFR (β = 0.64, p = 0.0029). In females, the associations varied by menstrual status. Among those with ceased menstruation, a DP reflecting low intake of meat, spirits, and refined grains, and high intake of whole grains and dairy products was associated with higher eGFR (β = 1.11, p = 0.0049). In females still experiencing regular menstruation, a DP reflecting high intake of beef, nuts, beer, and legumes, and low intake of refined grains was associated with lower eGFR (β = −0.43, p = 0.0326). No association was observed with the DASH score in females.
conclusionsThe DASH-style diet is associated with better kidney function in males, but not in females. Identifying sex-specific kidney function-oriented DPs using RRR provides new insights into the diet-eGFR relationship, suggesting potential effect modification by menstrual status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.