SynthesisBMC public health2026
Risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Chinese university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide among university students in China constitutes a critical public health challenge. Although numerous studies have examined risk factors, most have relied on cross-sectional designs. Evidence from longitudinal studies, particularly regarding protective factors, remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes longitudinal evidence to identify risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Chinese university students.
methodsSix electronic databases (three English-language and three Chinese-language databases) were systematically searched for longitudinal studies published up to October 2024. Eligible studies investigated predictors of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts among Chinese university students. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled effect sizes, expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Meta-regression analyses were used to examine temporal moderators, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.
resultsTwenty-two longitudinal studies comprising 953,651 participants were included. The strongest predictors of subsequent suicidal ideation were prior suicidal ideation, anxiety, and early morning awakening. Suicide attempts were most strongly associated with prior non-suicidal self-injury, insomnia symptoms, and academic pressure. Higher levels of social support were associated with a reduced risk of suicidal ideation, whereas other examined protective factors were not statistically significant. Meta-regression analyses indicated that the predictive strength of depressive symptoms for suicidal ideation attenuated with longer follow-up periods.
conclusionsSleep disturbances, academic pressure, and prior suicidal ideation may represent important targets for early identification among Chinese university students. The findings highlight the importance of addressing both psychological vulnerabilities and contextual stressors in suicide prevention efforts. Future longitudinal research should adopt standardized measurements to enhance comparability and inform culturally tailored population-level prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.