Evidence mapPaperPMID 42010643Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Recent research on rehabilitation interventions for post-stroke gait and balance in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Gerard Urimubenshi, Anne Kumurenzi, Farayi Kaseke, Roberta de Oliveira Cacho, Jussara Almeida de Oliveira Baggio

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerard UrimubenshiDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, KG 11 Ave, Kigali, Rwanda. ugerardus@gmail.com.
Anne KumurenziDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, KG 11 Ave, Kigali, Rwanda.
Farayi KasekeDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, KG 11 Ave, Kigali, Rwanda.
Roberta de Oliveira CachoFaculty of Health Sciences at Trairi (FACISA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Av Rio Branco, s/n, Centro, Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Jussara Almeida de Oliveira BaggioMedical Sciences and Nursing Complex - CCME, Federal University of Alagoas, Arapiraca, Rua Manoel Severino Barbosa, s/n, Bom sucesso, Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, with a disproportionate burden borne by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Gait and balance impairments are among the most common and disabling consequences of stroke, substantially limiting functional independence and increasing the risk of falls. Although rehabilitation interventions are known to improve gait and balance outcomes after stroke, the extent and nature of evidence generated in LMIC contexts remain unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to map the scope and characteristics of published studies reporting rehabilitation interventions targeting gait and/or balance among stroke survivors in LMICs, and to identify gaps to inform future research and practice.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of the published literature to identify recent (January 1st, 2014 - October 31st, 2025) studies on rehabilitation interventions promoting gait and/or balance among stroke survivors in LMICs. We searched the PubMed, EBSCOhost, PEDro and African Journals Online (AJOL) databases and screened references from bibliographies. Data were charted and summarized descriptively, focusing on intervention types and characteristics, as well as geographical distribution.

resultsThe search identified 728 records, of which 89 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were randomized or pilot randomized controlled trials, although reporting of intervention content, dose, and usual care comparators was often incomplete. The majority of interventions reflected conventional physiotherapy approaches such as task-specific gait training, balance exercises, strengthening, and functional mobility practice, while fewer studies evaluated treadmill-based, robotic, virtual-reality, neuromodulation, or other technology-supported programs. Research output was unevenly distributed across regions, with 64.0% being from Upper-Middle Income Countries (UMICs) and only two (2.2%) of the included studies conducted in low-income countries (LICs). Considerable heterogeneity was evident in intervention intensity, duration, terminology, and outcome measures.

conclusionsA wide range of rehabilitation interventions for post-stroke gait and balance has been investigated in LMICs; however, the evidence base remains fragmented, inconsistently reported, and geographically imbalanced. Future work should prioritize context-appropriate, rigorously designed studies, clearer reporting of intervention content and dose, and better representation of low-income settings to guide equitable and effective stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicPostural BalanceStroke RehabilitationEvidence GapsHumansStrokeBalanceGaitLow- and middle-income countriesRehabilitationScoping reviewStroke

Identifiers

PMID42010643
PMCPMC13238114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.