ArticleBMC biology2026
Genomic signatures of speciation and adaptation in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how populations diverge is one of the most compelling questions in evolutionary biology but our grasp on the genomic mechanisms underpinning divergence is limited to a handful of species. Indeed, we know even less about divergence in the pelagic zone, where barriers to gene flow are seemingly absent. The holopelagic ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi is the most widely used ctenophore in experimental biology and has become an important model system in studies ranging from developmental biology to neurobiology. In addition, its relatively small and tractable genome provides a powerful foundation for genomic and evolutionary analyses. However, we still lack a clear understanding of species boundaries, population structure, and the evolutionary forces shaping divergence within Mnemiopsis, limiting both evolutionary and ecological interpretations. To expand our general understanding of divergence across novel environments as well as resolve a long-standing taxonomic debate, we generated the most comprehensive genomic study to date of the holopelagic ctenophore Mnemiopsis across a large expanse of its native range.
resultsBy leveraging multiple analytical approaches and generating two near-chromosome level genomes, we identify two distinct species of Mnemiopsis with high levels of genome-wide divergence along the US Atlantic coast, which correspond to M. leidyi and M. gardeni. Our demographic analyses suggest that M. leidyi and M. gardeni began to diverge during the mid-to-late Pleistocene climate transitions and were later shaped by post-glacial oceanographic changes. We highlight substantial genomic rearrangements and copy number variation between species, as well as uncover key genes under selection that are likely important for environmental adaptation.
conclusionsTogether, these findings provide compelling evidence that the ctenophore currently recognized as M. leidyi represents more than one species. Recognizing cryptic species boundaries is critical for future study designs, environmental monitoring, and developing targeted management strategies. Altogether, we connect microevolutionary processes with macroevolutionary patterns and provide new insights into how ocean dynamics drive speciation and adaptation in pelagic ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.