ArticleInternet interventions2026
Uncovering latent trajectories of daily tinnitus symptoms through app-based monitoring during treatment.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tinnitus heterogeneity is well-documented across phenotypes, etiologies, risk factors, comorbidities and associated burden. However, variability in treatment response remains insufficiently explored and often masked by the group-level comparisons of clinical studies. Moreover, little is known about the temporal trajectories of symptoms during treatment. Longitudinal monitoring via smartphones using Ecological Momentary Assessment provides rich inter- and intraindividual data on fluctuations and trajectories of symptoms. In this study, we investigated whether individual 12-week trajectories of daily self-reported tinnitus symptoms during treatment could be meaningfully sub-grouped. 147 patients provided 9634 observations while undergoing single or combined applications of hearing aids, cognitive-behavioural therapy, structured counseling, and sound therapy. A four-class growth mixture model best fit the data. One class was characterized by an increase in tinnitus symptoms over time (18%), another showed stable symptom trajectories (40%), while the remaining two classes described symptom reductions with different onsets during treatment (early improvement: 20%; late improvement: 21%). The identified classes did not differ in baseline characteristics, indicating that this information could not be used to predict symptom trajectories. Additionally, all four classes were represented in nearly each treatment arm. Notably, retrospective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) did not consistently align with latent symptom trajectories. These results underscore the heterogeneity and non-linearity of symptomatic change both within and across treatment modalities. We propose that app-based trajectories reveal details about symptom improvement that cannot be seen in standard PROMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.