Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011335›Full record

Trial reportOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026

Cognitive muscular therapy™ for knee osteoarthritis: A feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Stephen J Preece, Nathan Brookes, Jennifer Parker, Daniela Ghio, Amy Waghorne, Sally Gates, Caroline Fairhurst, Rebecca Wright, Anthony Jones, David Torgerson and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephen J PreeceCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Nathan BrookesCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Jennifer ParkerCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Daniela GhioDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, School of Health Sciences, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Amy WaghorneDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, School of Health Sciences, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sally GatesCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Caroline FairhurstYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Rebecca WrightCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Anthony JonesCentre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
David TorgersonYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Nicola E WalshHuman Pain Research Group, Division of Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: People with knee osteoarthritis exhibit overactivity of the knee muscles during functional tasks. This will increase mechanical loads and may exacerbate pain. Cognitive Muscular Therapy™ (CMT) is a new conservative intervention that aims to reduce muscle overactivity and change habitual responses to pain. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial, designed to compare CMT with usual care. Methods: Patients with knee osteoarthritis, who had failed to benefit from previous therapeutic exercise, were randomised to receive CMT or usual care. Participants in the CMT arm were offered seven individual sessions, delivered by an NHS physiotherapist trained to deliver the intervention. Trial feasibility was assessed by monitoring recruitment, adherence, retention, treatment fidelity and acceptability through an embedded process evaluation. Secondary outcome measures included WOMAC and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Results: 82 patients were recruited from 164 screened. Of the 42 allocated to the CMT arm, 32 completed the treatment. Retention was acceptable in the CMT arm but higher than anticipated in the usual care arm. Both patients and physiotherapists found the treatment to be acceptable, and the mean intervention fidelity score was 91%. Composite WOMAC score reduced by 17.1 points in the CMT arm from baseline to 20-weeks, and 2.8 points in the control arm over the same period. Conclusions: CMT is an acceptable intervention for people with knee osteoarthritis. Future large-scale trials are now required to quantify the clinical effectiveness of this promising new treatment. Trial registration: ISRCTN25291958.

Indexed as

Behavioural interventionBiofeedbackEMGKnee osteoarthritisPhysiotherapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42011335
PMCPMC13092002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.