Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011597›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026

Unlocking the Functional Properties of Plant Proteins in Designing Food Formulations for Senior Adults.

Kinza Mukhtar, Jian Ying, Yong Wang, Cordelia Selomulya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kinza MukhtarSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jian YingNutrition and Health Research Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, China.
Yong WangSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3744-912X
Cordelia SelomulyaSchool of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-0308

Funding

Australian Research Council DP250101468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aging population presents an increasing need for protein-rich food that supports health, functionality, and quality of life in senior adults. Plant proteins, with their sustainability and nutritional potentials, are emerging as promising yet complex alternatives to animal proteins in this context. This review builds on recent advances in the functional properties, modification strategies, and formulation approaches of plant proteins tailored for senior adults. The discussion connects molecular and structural insights with nutritional relevance, showing how physical, chemical, and enzymatic modifications affect digestibility, texture, and bioactivity. However, these strategies can involve trade-offs, whereby improvements in one functional property may compromise other functional attributes (e.g., aggregation decreasing solubility or extensive hydrolysis weakening gelation), highlighting the need to identify optimal processing windows. Aging-related constraints, including dysphagia and anabolic resistance, are therefore discussed using measurable targets such as IDDSI-aligned rheology/texture (e.g., viscosity, hardness) and nutritional metrics relevant to postprandial amino acid availability (e.g., leucine density and digestibility/bioaccessibility). By critically examining the interrelationship between processing, protein functionality, and physiological needs, this review provides an integrative framework for developing plant-based foods to meet the specific dietary needs of senior adults.

Indexed as

Plant ProteinsAgingFood HandlingHumansNutritive ValuePlant Proteinsmalnutritionplant proteinsprotein functionalityprotein modificationsenior adults

Identifiers

PMID42011597
PMCPMC13096989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.