Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012787›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Endoscopic Surveillance in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome, Two or Three-Year Intervals: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial.

Jorge López-Vicente, Daniel Rodríguez-Alcalde, Luis Hernández Villalba, Patricia Pedregal Pascual, Luisa Adán Merino, Francisco Polo Ortiz, Xabier Bessa Caserras, Jose Carlos Marín Gabriel, David Varillas Delgado, endoscopy for high-risk cancer conditions group of the Spanish Gastroenterological Association, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04906343 (Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04906343 nacompletednot on this map

Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario de MóstolesRan2021 to 2024Enrolled144ConditionsColonic Polyp, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Cancer, Serrated PolyposisArmsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jorge López-VicenteDepartment of Gastroenterology. Hospital, Universitario de Móstoles. Calle Doctor Luis Montes, s/n. 28935 - Móstoles (Madrid), Madrid, Spain. jlvicente@salud.madrid.org.
Daniel Rodríguez-AlcaldeDepartment of Gastroenterology. Hospital, Universitario de Móstoles. Calle Doctor Luis Montes, s/n. 28935 - Móstoles (Madrid), Madrid, Spain.
Luis Hernández VillalbaGastroenterology Department, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain.
Patricia Pedregal PascualGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Luisa Adán MerinoGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Polo OrtizGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
Xabier Bessa CaserrasGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Carlos Marín GabrielGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
David Varillas DelgadoFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
endoscopy for high-risk cancer conditions group of the Spanish Gastroenterological Association, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerrated polyposis syndrome, the most prevalent colonic polyposis, confers an increased colorectal cancer risk. Guidelines recommend close colonoscopy surveillance, but recent data suggest low neoplasia rates, supporting longer colonoscopy intervals.

aimsCompare advanced neoplasia incidence between two- and three-year surveillance.

methodsA multicentre, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted (May 2021-November 2024) in six Spanish hospitals. Patients fulfilling the 2019 WHO criteria for serrated polyposis syndrome, including newly diagnosed individuals and those already under surveillance, with no advanced neoplasia and fewer than five relevant polyps at their previous colonoscopy, were randomized to surveillance at 2 or 3 years. The primary endpoint was advanced neoplasia incidence.

resultsA total of 131 patients with serrated polyposis syndrome were included (47.3% women; mean age 66.1). Seventy-two were assigned to 2-year and 59 to 3-year colonoscopy. Among 771 resected lesions, 2.4% were advanced adenomas or advanced serrated polyps; no colorectal cancer was detected. The proportion of patients with advanced neoplasia in the surveillance colonoscopy was 6.9% (2-year) vs 13.6% (3-year), with no statistical difference (p = 0.208) but with a risk difference of + 6.7% (95% CI -4.1 to 17.5%) exceeding the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of + 10%. Time since serrated polyposis syndrome diagnosis ≤ 3 years was associated with advanced neoplasia (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.56-14.71; p = 0.024).

conclusionsIn patients with serrated polyposis syndrome, extending colonoscopy surveillance to a three-year compared with a two-year interval yielded inconclusive evidence regarding non-inferiority for advanced neoplasia incidence. The early years following serrated polyposis syndrome diagnosis were identified as a risk factor for advanced neoplasia.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04906343). Date: 5-10-2021.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSpainTime FactorsCancerPolypSurveillanceVigilance

Identifiers

PMID42012787
PMCPMC13521978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.