Evidence mapPaperPMID 42012831Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Bright IDEAS-YA Skills Training and Psychosocial Outcomes of Young Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Katie A Devine, Marie Barnett, Kristine A Donovan, Lora M A Thompson, Sharon L Manne, Julia Kearney, Kristine Levonyan-Radloff, Diana B Diaz, Isabelle Anderson, Shengguo Li and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04585269 (Bright IDEAS-Young Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04585269 nacompletednot on this map

Bright IDEAS-Young Adults: Problem-Solving Skills Training to Reduce Distress Among Young Adults With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2021 to 2026Enrolled344ConditionsCancer Patients, Young Adult, Supportive CareArmsBright IDEAS-YA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katie A DevinePediatric Population Science, Outcomes, and Disparities Research Section, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Marie BarnettMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kristine A DonovanMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Lora M A ThompsonMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Sharon L ManneDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Julia KearneyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kristine Levonyan-RadloffPediatric Population Science, Outcomes, and Disparities Research Section, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Diana B DiazMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Isabelle AndersonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Shengguo LiDepartment of Biometrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Pamela Ohman-StricklandRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Olle Jane Z SahlerUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Funding

The Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement and Language (PRO-CEL) CoreP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · 1985 to 2025
$88.4M
Bright IDEAS-Young Adults: Problem-Solving Skills Training to Reduce Distress among Young Adults with CancerR37CA240807 · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · 2025 to 2025
$630k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R37 CA240807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Young adults (YAs; ages 18-39 years) diagnosed with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges, including high distress and poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are few efficacious interventions tailored to their needs. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Bright IDEAS-YA, a problem-solving skills training intervention tailored for YAs, in reducing distress and improving HRQOL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 academic medical centers and enrolled participants between February 2021 and March 2024. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 39 years, within 4 months of a first cancer diagnosis, and undergoing systemic therapy. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Intervention: Bright IDEAS-YA is a 6-session, one-on-one intervention that teaches a structured approach to problem-solving. Enhanced usual care (EUC) included standard psychosocial care plus a list of adolescent and YA resources. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were depression and anxiety (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms) and HRQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) at 6 months. Problem-solving ability (Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Short Form) was examined as a mediator. Analyses used linear mixed effects models and mediation analysis. Results: Of the 1128 YAs screened, 344 YAs (median [IQR] age, 31.27 [25.78-36.38] years; 251 female [62.5%]) enrolled, with 171 allocated to intervention and 173 allocated to control. Overall, 296 YAs (86.0%) and 280 YAs (81.4%) completed 3- and 6-month surveys, respectively. At 6 months, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements than EUC in depression (effect size estimate, -3.23 points; 95% CI, -4.93 to -1.53 points; P < .001), anxiety (effect size estimate,-2.43 points; 95% CI, -4.05 to -0.81 points; P = .003), and HRQOL (effect size estimate, 3.40 points; 95% CI, 0.34 to 6.45 points; P = .03). These changes were clinically meaningful. Mediation analyses showed that improvements in depression and anxiety were partially due to increased problem-solving ability, particularly reductions in negative problem orientation. Sex and education were moderators of treatment effect, with the treatment effect on anxiety being greater for males (effect size estimate, -5.29 points; 95% CI, -7.97 to -2.60 points) and the treatment effect on anxiety (effect size estimate, -6.94 points; 95% CI, -10.50 to -3.43 points) and depression (effect size estimate, -7.47 points; 95% CI, -11.20 to -3.74 points; P < .001) being greater for those with lower education. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of Bright IDEAS-YA, intervention participants had significantly reduced distress and improved HRQOL relative to control. These findings suggest that Bright IDEAS-YA may be offered as supportive care for YAs with cancer to improve psychosocial outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585269.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProblem SolvingQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42012831
PMCPMC13100872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.