ArticlePloS one2026
Understanding the implementation of continuity-enhancing innovations as steps towards midwife-led continuity of care: A qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine how specific midwife-led continuity of care elements are implemented and sustained in a maternity care system where independent community midwives collaborate with hospital-based care professionals.
methodsAn explanatory qualitative study was conducted, using the Normalization Process Theory as a conceptual framework. Maternity care networks that had implemented an innovation contributing to midwife-led continuity of care were included in the study. Stakeholders invited to participate in semi-structured interviews included community midwives, hospital-based midwives, obstetricians, managers, an obstetric nurse, and healthcare insurance company employees. Participants were recruited through an initial purposive sampling strategy. As data collection progressed, theoretical sampling was applied.
resultsA total of 47 interviews were conducted with stakeholders from nine different maternity care networks. While many participants expressed strong conceptual support for midwife-led continuity of care (coherence), this did not always translate into aligned action in practice (collective action). Trust between stakeholders and financial feasibility were dominant themes across all four constructs of the Normalization Process Theory. Trust was found to develop incrementally through small collaborative steps but remained fragile in competitive or hierarchical networks. Financial structures shaped both engagement and resistance.
conclusionThe implementation process and normalization of midwife-led continuity of care elements are not only shaped by practical or organizational considerations but are also highly dependent on trust between stakeholders and financial feasibility. As dual preconditions, trust and financial alignment must be in place for stakeholders to consider new collaborative models and to be able to act in line with their beliefs. In systems with longstanding institutional divisions and fragmented funding, transformative change requires simultaneous investment in relational infrastructure and financial redesign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.