Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013142›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Serological responses to killed oral cholera vaccine (OCV) when given 4 years after initial receipt of OCV in Cameroon: A randomized controlled trial.

Jerome Ateudjieu, Ketina Hirma Tchio-Nighie, Etienne Guenou, Carrel Fokou, Collins Buh Nkum, Landry Beyala Bita'a, Winny Dora Ateudjieu-Kenfack, Sabine Nanfak, Amanda K Debes, David A Sack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jerome AteudjieuDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-1160
Ketina Hirma Tchio-NighieDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-8931
Etienne GuenouDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8027-7311
Carrel FokouDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Collins Buh NkumDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-9685
Landry Beyala Bita'aDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-4210
Winny Dora Ateudjieu-KenfackDepartment Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9119-6940
Sabine NanfakDepartment of Health Research, M.A. SANTE, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-2076
Amanda K DebesJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4006-073X
David A SackJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9338-5119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cholera vaccination (OCV) is one of strategies to help control cholera with two doses recommended as initial vaccination and booster doses recommended 3-5 years later to prevent future outbreaks. There is no actual recommendation on the number of doses required during booster vaccination. An OCV campaign conducted in Mogode-Cameroon provided an opportunity to determine if revaccination four years after would induce a booster response. 350 people living in Mogode-Cameroon, who received 0, 1 or 2 doses of OCV four years earlier, were stratified into age groups, < 5, 5-14, and >14 and randomized into two arms. Arm A received a single dose and Arm B received two doses 14 days apart. We aimed to determine if people who had received OCV four years earlier responded with a booster immune response compared to those not vaccinated. Serum samples were collected at baseline and at multiple time points after vaccination to measure vibriocidal antibody titers. For Arm A, vibriocidal GMT significantly increased nine days after the first dose with a response rate of 61-70%; however, early vibriocidal response (day 4-6) was rare (22%) and were similar in those who had received vaccine four years earlier and those who did not. Ogawa, but not Inaba, vibriocidal responses were higher on day 9 for those who had been vaccinated earlier, but vibriocidal titers during subsequent timepoints were similar in all study arms. In Arm B, there were no early response (day 4-6) after the second dose. Overall, OCV induced a measurable immune response by day 9, but no evidence of a rapid booster response was detected following revaccination. Since there was no evidence that the earlier vaccination stimulated a booster response when vaccination is repeated, this suggests that persons being revaccinated should receive the two doses as was recommended initially. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry under the reference PACTR202102660004195.

Identifiers

PMID42013142
PMCPMC13098963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.