Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42013455›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Clinical Model Autophagy: The Risk of Interpretative Drift in Recursive Medical AI.

Pei Fan Shih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid integration of large language models into electronic medical record systems introduces a critical theoretical vulnerability. Drawing on foundational computer science proofs of "model collapse," this viewpoint introduces the concept of "Clinical Model Autophagy"-a systemic degradation of diagnostic integrity that occurs when clinical artificial intelligence (AI) models are recursively trained on unverified, AI-generated synthetic data. As these recursive models may progressively regress toward statistical means, they undergo "Interpretative Drift," a clinically concerning phenomenon where rare pathological variances are systematically erased and complex diseases are homogenized into benign averages. To prevent the irreversible contamination of health care data ecosystems, the author urgently proposes the Data Purity Standard (DPS). The DPS mandates the cryptographic watermarking of all AI-assisted clinical entries for provenance tracking, alongside the establishment of "Human Vaults." These physically segregated repositories of physician-verified heritage data will serve as immutable biological anchors to safely guide future AI training, ensuring the long-term reliability of digital health infrastructure.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsHumansLarge Language Modelsdata governancediagnostic errorselectronic health recordslarge language modelsmodel collapse

Identifiers

PMID42013455
PMCPMC13146229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.