Evidence mapPaperPMID 42014146Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

ProHealth: a co-designed online home-based healthy eating and exercise programme for men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy - a study protocol for a feasibility and preliminary efficacy randomised controlled trial.

Brenton J Baguley, Robin M Daly, Patricia M Livingston, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Victoria M White, Harriet Koorts, Steve F Fraser, Jason Gardner, Lauren Atkins, Belinda Steer and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Brenton J BaguleyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia b.baguley@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-8107
Robin M DalyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-1598
Patricia M LivingstonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-3839
Jonathan C RawstornInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Victoria M WhiteSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-8484
Harriet KoortsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1303-6064
Steve F FraserInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Jason GardnerSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren AtkinsSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Belinda SteerSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eric OFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Nicole HenekaCentre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Gavin AbbottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-0705
Garrett RussellConsumer representative, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Greg McNamaraConsumer representative, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole KissInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-9834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves survival in advanced prostate cancer but may lead to debilitating side effects, including sarcopenic obesity and a 10-45% increased risk of other comorbidities. Guidelines recommend exercise and nutrition interventions during ADT, but access to these services is often limited, and referral pathways are unclear. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online, home-based, multi-faceted, exercise, nutrition and education programme (ProHealth) for men with prostate cancer treated with ADT. ProHealth was co-designed with consumers and healthcare professionals to include (i) education on prostate cancer and treatment-related side effects and (ii) multimedia behaviour change resources to support individualised nutrition and exercise behaviour change. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 12-week randomised controlled trial (target n=50) will include men treated with ADT for >3 months or who have completed ADT in the last 24 months, are overweight or obese and are not under the care of a dietitian or exercise professional. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to the ProHealth intervention or usual care. The intervention group will receive four consultations with an Accredited Practising Dietitian to promote a high protein and energy reduced diet, and five consultations with an Accredited Exercise Physiologist to follow a home-based progressive resistance training and aerobic exercise programme. The primary outcomes are feasibility (recruitment rate, retention, data completeness, reach, safety, consultation attendance and adherence, and usage of the ProHealth web platform), acceptability and satisfaction of the ProHealth intervention. Exploratory secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks and include changes in body weight and composition (total and appendicular fat-free mass, fat mass), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General, FACT-Prostate, FACT-Fatigue), physical function (30-second sit-to-stand), dietary intake (3-day food diary) and physical activity (7-day accelerometer). Linear regression models will estimate differences between the intervention and usual care group. Qualitative interviews on participant satisfaction will be transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC2024-038) and registered on Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000874516). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings and other public forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12624000874516.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsDiet, HealthyExercise TherapyProstatic NeoplasmsExerciseFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleObesityPatient Education as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrogen AntagonistsDigital TechnologyExerciseNUTRITION & DIETETICSProstate

Identifiers

PMID42014146
PMCPMC13110628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.