Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014147›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study.

Esther Z Chanakira, Chloe Thomas, Jacqueline Miot, Olena Mandrik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther Z ChanakiraSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK e.z.chanakira@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-0758
Chloe ThomasSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8704-3262
Jacqueline MiotHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of Witswatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-3826
Olena MandrikSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Women with lower income, those living in rural areas and women of Black ethnicity are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages and have poorer survival outcomes. Reducing these inequities is an important public health priority. This study aimed to identify a cost-effective strategy for reducing breast cancer-related inequities and to evaluate the equity impact of the intervention across population subgroups.

methodsWe developed a novel individual-level microsimulation model to assess both the equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker-led education intervention in rural areas. The model, with annual cycles, simulated rural and urban breast cancer populations in South Africa using data from national and regional cancer datasets and followed individuals over a lifetime horizon. Costs were estimated from the provider perspective and outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) compared with three willingness-to-pay thresholds (ZAR 58 018/ZAR 109 468/ZAR 328 408). Parameter uncertainty was explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Equity impact was evaluated by estimating changes in age-standardised all-cause mortality across subgroups defined by place of residence (rural vs urban) and ethnicity (Black vs non-Black), using both absolute (rate differences) and relative (rate ratios) measures.

resultsThe intervention generated average gains of 0.35 life-years and 0.31 QALYs per patient across the breast cancer population. Inequities by residence decreased, with an absolute reduction of 229.65 per 1000 patients with breast cancer in the age-standardised mortality rate difference, and a relative reduction in the rate ratio of 0.80. By ethnicity, absolute and relative reductions of 110.26 per 1000 patients and 0.27, respectively, were observed between Black and non-Black populations. The intervention was cost-effective, with an ICER of ZAR 44 124 (I$6036) per QALY gained, which is below all three willingness-to-pay thresholds considered.

conclusionsCommunity health worker programmes represent a cost-effective strategy to reduce breast cancer-related inequities. Their integration into national cancer control plans in low-income and middle-income countries should be prioritised and supported.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCommunity Health WorkersHealth EducationAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRural PopulationSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSouth AfricaAfrica South of the SaharaEarly Detection of CancerHEALTH ECONOMICSHealth EquityPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42014147
PMCPMC13110530

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.