ArticleScientific data2026
A comprehensive bedside chest radiography dataset with structured, itemized and graded radiologic reports.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated analysis of bedside chest radiographs remains challenging due to limited large-scale datasets with expert annotations and standardized severity grading. We provide TAIX-Ray, a comprehensive dataset of 215,381 bedside chest radiographs collected from 47,724 intensive care unit patients (30,306 male, 17,418 female, median age 68 years) collected over 14 years (01/2010-12/2023) at the University Hospital Aachen, Germany. During routine clinical reporting, 134 trained radiologists provided structured, itemized reports using a standardized template. They systematically assessed eight pathological findings: heart size (cardiomegaly), pulmonary congestion, pleural effusion (left/right), pulmonary opacities (left/right), and atelectasis (left/right) using a five-point ordinal severity scale (absent, questionable, mild, moderate, severe). The dataset includes (i) bedside chest radiographs (anteroposterior projections), (ii) structured, itemized reports, (iii) patient demographics (age and sex), and (iv) the temporal metadata. To facilitate immediate research adoption, we provide a baseline transformer model, implementation code, and predefined data splits, ensuring reproducible benchmarking. This resource enables the development of clinical AI models for automated pathology detection and severity assessment in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.