Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014425›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Conserved and divergent features of human mRNA decapping revealed by biochemical reconstitution.

Eric A J Simko, Sowndarya Muthukumar, Tanner M Myers, Anna L Valkov, Eugene Valkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric A J Simko *National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Sowndarya Muthukumar *Division of Molecular Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund Stem Cell Center, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. sowndarya.muthukumar@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-9110-722X
Tanner M MyersNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Anna L ValkovNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Eugene ValkovNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA. eugene.valkov@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-1739

Funding

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1ZIABC011977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decapping is a critical step in mRNA decay, but the mechanisms regulating human decapping enzyme DCP2 remain poorly understood. Here, we reconstitute the human decapping network using full-length recombinant proteins and compare it to the yeast system. Unlike in yeast, we find that the C-terminal region of human DCP2 is not autoinhibitory. RNA-binding residues of yeast Dcp2 are not conserved in the human homolog, and we find instead that a charged C-terminal region mediates substrate recognition. Human DCP1 does not stably interact with or directly stimulate DCP2, but mediates activation by the enhancer PNRC2. We also demonstrate that decapping enhancer EDC4 forms tetramers through an extended coiled-coil region, and that both DCP1 and EDC4 homomeric species can further assemble into higher-order oligomers. Furthermore, structural predictions incorporating these findings suggest a model for DCP2 recruitment by EDC4 tetramers. These findings reveal key mechanistic differences between human and yeast decapping regulation and provide insight into the molecular architecture underlying mRNA decay.

Indexed as

EndoribonucleasesRNA CapsRNA, MessengerAmino Acid SequenceHumansProteinsRNA StabilitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDCP2 protein, humanEDC4 protein, humanEndoribonucleasesProteinsRNA CapsRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42014425
PMCPMC13103063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.