ArticleScientific reports2026
High-yield isolation and characterization of microvascular niche cells from human full-thickness skin biopsies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of physiologically relevant in vitro vascular models requires access to the cellular components of the microvascular niche. However, most studies rely on a limited subset of vascular or support cells, often using pooled, immortalized, or non-adult sources. To address this limitation, a protocol was developed for the simultaneous isolation of human dermal blood endothelial cells (HDBECs), lymphatic endothelial cells (HDLECs), fibroblasts (HDFs), and pericytes (HDPCs) from adult skin biopsies. Biopsies (25-100 cm²) from donors (age 28-67) were processed using enzymatic and mechanical dissociation, followed by FACS with lineage- and exclusion-specific markers. Purity and identity were verified by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence, and functionality tested in 3D fibrin gels. The protocol yielded all four cell types with high efficiency. Endothelial populations exhibited CD31 and ERG expression, with HDLECs displaying higher PDPN and PROX1 than HDBECs. Support cells showed distinct morphologies, and differences in CD49a and FSP1 enabled discrimination between HDFs and HDPCs. In 3D gels, both endothelial populations formed vascular-like networks with matched support cells. We report a robust method to isolate phenotypically distinct HDBECs, HDLECs, HDFs, and HDPCs from adult skin, supporting the generation of donor-matched microvascular models for aging research, disease modeling, and personalized therapeutic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.