Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42014670›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Faith without action? Christian ecological conviction and the civic participation gap in Australia.

Timothy J Healy, Johannes M Luetz, Martin J Hodson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy J HealySchool of Ministry and Theology, Alphacrucis University College, Perth, WA, 6103, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-7978
Johannes M LuetzSchool of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. j.luetz@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-4471
Martin J HodsonDepartment of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-2926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-quarters of the world's population identify with a religion, suggesting that faith communities constitute a vast (yet under-mobilised) civic infrastructure for sustainability transitions. Christianity remains the world's largest religious tradition, making it consequential for analysing conviction-action dynamics. Using Australia as a case study, this research investigates why widely professed moral concern for the environment does not translate more readily into collective environmental action. Using Australia as a case study, our national sample survey (n = 1295), weighted to reflect the Australian population aged 18+, indicates a belief-action gap that is systematic rather than incidental, underpinned by barriers across micro-meso-macro levels. Our analysis identifies actionable strategies to help faith communities translate ecological conviction into effective civic engagement with policy-relevant sustainability outcomes. By clarifying pathways through which faith commitments can be mobilised into civic action, the article offers insights transferable beyond Australia and churches to other national and faith contexts, with implications for advancing SDGs 3, 6, 11, 12, 13, 16, and 17.

Indexed as

ChristianityCommunity ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesAustraliaHumansBelief–behaviour gapChristianity and environmentCivic engagementFaith and ecologyPro-environmental actionSustainability transitions

Identifiers

PMID42014670
PMCPMC13661882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.