ReviewBDJ open2026
Brain parcellation for TMD neuroimaging: a critical narrative review.
Review in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze modern brain mapping for neurobiological mechanisms of temporomandibular disorders, with particular emphasis on structural and functional alterations, employing advanced neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and DTI. Furthermore, this study aims to identify the most appropriate combination of brain parcellation schemes that comprehensively cover cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures to enhance the accuracy and standardization of neuroimaging protocols in TMD research.
methodsScientific sources were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar as of 29.06.2025, 689 records were identified for PRISMA workflow, of which 676 records remained for screening after the removing duplicates and irrelevant items, 630 records were excluded per prespecified criteria (inappropriate diagnoses, insufficiently described rapid studies, metabolic disorders), and 46 studies were included in the qualitative analysis.
resultsWe compare anatomical, functional, and multimodal atlases (Desikan-Killiany, Destrieux, Schaefer, HCP-MMP1.0, Brainnetome, SUIT, Brainstem atlases) in terms of fMRI/DTI compatibility and relevance of regions of interest.
conclusionsThe authors suggest that the use of a combined parcellation scheme: HCP-MMP1.0 for the highly detailed cortex, SUIT for the cerebellum, specialized brainstem atlases-which cover corticocortical, cerebellar, and brainstem connections-increases mapping accuracy and meets modern requirements for the standardization of neuroimaging protocols in studies of the TMD.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.