ArticleScientific reports2026
CNDP1 (CTG)
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homozygous carriers of the CNDP1 (CTG)5 allele with diabetes mellitus are believed to have a lower risk of developing diabetic kidney disease compared to individuals carrying alleles with higher numbers of this CTG repeat. However, recent studies claimed that homozygosity for the (CTG)5 allele increases the risk of disease progression towards end-stage renal disease and even cardiovascular mortality, at least in women. Therefore, this study sought to confirm in a prospective manner in a cardiovascular high-risk cohort if individuals with two (CTG)5 alleles indeed have an increased cardiovascular mortality. 3,201 individuals from the LURIC study were included and followed for a median of 9.9 years. CNDP1 (CTG)n genotypes were assessed and related to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. 1,157 (36.1%) patients carried the homozygous CNDP1 (CTG)5 genotype. No significant difference for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was detected after multiple adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors, neither for the whole cohort nor for men or women, respectively. In this prospective cardiovascular high-risk cohort, homozygosity for the CNDP1 (CTG)5 allele was not associated with increased cardiovascular mortality compared to all other genotypes together. These findings do not confirm previous reports suggesting a sex-specific increase in cardiovascular mortality among women carrying two (CTG)5 alleles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.