Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effects of mulberry twig alkaloids and canagliflozin in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study based on flash glucose monitoring.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT05856578. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing First Hospital
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbal medicines hold therapeutic potential for diabetes management. This study compared the efficacy and safety of mulberry twig alkaloids (SZ-A) versus canagliflozin administration in poorly oral-antidiabetic controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by using the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. Sixty poorly controlled diabetic patients were randomly assigned to two groups: SZ-A group (n = 30) and canagliflozin group (n = 30). All patients received add-on therapy either SZ-A or canagliflozin treatment for 12 weeks. FGM was applied for 7 days before the start of treatment (baseline) and for 7 days during the final week (week 12) of the 12-week treatment period. General clinical data were collected and analyzed. After 12 weeks of treatment, both SZ-A and canagliflozin significantly reduced HbA1c, fasting and postprandial glucose, 24 h mean blood glucose, and time above range (TAR). Time in range (TIR) was comparable between SZ-A (72.08%) and canagliflozin (73.85%), with no increase in time below range (TBR). In contrast to canagliflozin, SZ-A significantly reduced postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) after breakfast and dinner. Both SZ-A and canagliflozin also improved insulin resistance and enhanced insulin sensitivity in patients. Additionally, both treatments significantly improved metabolism parameters, including weight, waist circumference, and triglyceride. SZ-A showed hypoglycemic and metabolic effects comparable to canagliflozin, with superior control of postprandial glucose excursion after breakfast and dinner.Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05856578 (Registered 15 March 2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.