ArticleScientific reports2026
Leveraging anteroposterior force oscillations to assist walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although humans employ various strategies to minimize metabolic cost, walking still has a substantial cost. Half of this cost comes from leg work to accelerate and decelerate the center of mass (CoM) in the anteroposterior direction. Studies showed how applying forward forces to assist CoM acceleration drastically reduces metabolic cost. However, the effect of combining this with assisting deceleration remains unclear. Here we show that oscillating forward and backward forces with zero net work in total can also reduce the metabolic cost by 11%. In the first part of this manuscript, we used a robotic tether to apply timed forces and found forward forces are most effective when applied around the middle of the double stance (approximately 0-30% of the step cycle), whereas the optimal window for backward forces was broader, spanning roughly 50-80% of the step cycle, and the effect of timing was not strong for this force direction. Nevertheless, the results suggest that a passive device, such as a mass-spring system, could also reduce metabolic cost. In the second part, we describe simulations and experiments of walking with a wheeled mass-spring system. Simulations suggest that certain stiffnesses could reduce the estimated metabolic cost. However, human experiments showed around 60% increase in metabolic cost rather than a reduction, likely due to friction and suboptimal timings. The finding that the results did not match theoretical predictions is similar to challenges in other wearable robotics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.