ArticleBMC genomics2026
Intestinal microbiota-host crosstalk reveals mechanisms regulating residual feed intake in egg-type ducks.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs an important economic trait in ducks, residual feed intake (RFI) may be influenced by the intestinal microbiota. However, the mechanisms underlying microbiota-host crosstalk remain unclear.
resultsWe analyzed the total egg number (TEN), total egg weight (TEW), total feed intake (TFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and RFI of 1,370 ducks over a 32-day period. Within the high-TEW ducks, 60 low RFI ducks and 60 high RFI ducks were selected to form the LH group (LH) and HH group (HH), respectively. The TFI, FCR, and RFI were significantly lower in the LH than in the HH (P < 0.001). Based on 16S rRNA sequencing, the duodenal microbiota in the LH showed a significantly higher evenness index compared to the HH (P < 0.05). Using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), differential bacterial genera were identified in the duodenum and jejunum between groups (LDA > 3.5, P < 0.05). Functional prediction results indicated that, compared to the HH, the duodenal microbiota of the LH appeared to be more active in metabolism. Further analysis revealed four genera (Paenibacillus, Kocuria, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus) that showed significant differences in both the duodenum and jejunum (LDA > 3.5, P < 0.05). Their abundances in the LH were significantly higher than those in the HH (P < 0.05). Subsequently, 419 and 384 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the duodenum and jejunum using DESeq2, respectively (|Log2FC)|≥ 1, P < 0.05). Functional enrichment analysis showed that 22 and 16 pathways were significantly enriched in the duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.05). Among them, five metabolism-related pathways, such as steroid biosynthesis, were co-enriched in both intestinal segments. We constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs from the five pathways and utilized the MCODE plugin to extract the top-ranking subnetwork. The expression levels of genes in this subnetwork (HMGCS1, MSMO1, ACAT2, LSS, FDFT1, SQLE, IDI1, CYP51A1) were significantly correlated with the abundance of key genera.
conclusionsPaenibacillus, Kocuria, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus were identified as key microbiota influencing feed efficiency in ducks. Their abundances were closely associated with the expression of HMGCS1, MSMO1, ACAT2, LSS, FDFT1, SQLE, IDI1, and CYP51A1. The specific mechanisms require further validation in future studies. These findings provide a preliminary investigation into the intestinal microbiota-host crosstalk affecting feed efficiency and offer novel perspectives for reducing RFI in egg-type ducks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.