Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015037›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Virtual reality in psychological interventions for mood disorders: a scoping review.

Yufei Wang, Kehua Yang, Tingting Yang, Ping Xu, Miaomiao Lin, Yujing Fan, Yuexian Tao

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yufei WangSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Kehua YangSir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tingting YangSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ping XuSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Miaomiao LinSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yujing FanSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuexian TaoSchool of Public Health and Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Yuextao@outlook.com.

Funding

the Science and Technology Programme for Medicine and Health in Zhejiang Province 2024KY245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMood disorders impose substantial physical and psychological burdens globally. Virtual reality (VR)- based psychological interventions have gained attention as a potential approach in this field. However, current research on these interventions for mood disorders remains heterogeneous and lacks a comprehensive synthesis. A scoping review is needed to map the existing evidence, and to identify trends and gaps in this emerging area.

objectiveThis scoping review was to synthesize the existing status of applications about virtual reality-based psychological interventions for mood disorders by examining the characteristics and reported outcomes of included studies.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We performed systematic searches across seven electronic databases and gray literature sources. The search encompassed all available records from database inception to March 2026, focusing on studies that were about VR-based psychological interventions for mood disorders.

results18 studies were included, finding four types of VR-based psychological interventions, namely cognitive-oriented, experiential-oriented, social situation simulation, and psychoeducational tools. Based on user interaction modes, these interventions were classified into immersive interactive and non-interactive categories. Interventions generally included 1-24 sessions (4-90 min per session, 1-2 sessions weekly), with the most common being 4-12 sessions of 30-50 min each. All studies assessed efficacy, with depressive symptoms and emotion regulation as the most frequent outcomes. 55.6% included feasibility evaluation. User experience feedback highlighted five themes, including interaction design, environmental fidelity, hardware suitability, user experience, and reality transferability.

conclusionsThis review identified four intervention types by content and therapeutic orientation and two categories by user interaction modes. VR-based psychological interventions for mood disorders remain at an early stage. Future research should develop standardized intervention frameworks and conduct more high-quality trials across diverse populations to confirm their effectiveness. CLINICAL

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Mood DisordersPsychosocial InterventionVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyHumansBipolar disorderDepressionMood disordersPsychological interventionsScoping reviewVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42015037
PMCPMC13231538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.