ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Exploring the Neural Substrates of Number Sense: A Perspective on Genetics, Behaviour and Neural Circuity.
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Neural Substrates of Number Sense: A Perspective on Genetics, Behaviour and Neural Circuity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Number sense is the intuitive, non-verbal ability to perceive and process numerical quantities without formal counting. This evolutionarily conserved trait, shared by different animal species, is supported by two mechanisms: the object tracking system (OTS) for small sets and the approximate number system (ANS) for larger quantities. Although historically viewed as distinct, these systems interact dynamically; their disruption is implicated in developmental dyscalculia and disorders such as Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS), a chromosome microdeletion characterised by marked numerical and visuospatial deficits. Here, we synthesise neurobiological advances to provide an integrative perspective on the neural substrates of number sense. Field studies provide ecological validity, while laboratory procedures offer tighter precision; together, they illuminate the biological foundations of numerical cognition. Although number sense is conserved, human studies indicate only moderate heritability likely reflecting directional selection. Nonetheless, genetic findings converge on neurodevelopmental and synaptic mechanisms. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) offer a powerful platform to bridge genes, circuits and behaviour. For instance, manipulating zebrafish genes linked to WBS reveals gene-specific effects on quantity processing. At the neural level, numerical cognition is largely supported by specialised number-selective neurons. Whole-brain calcium imaging in larval zebrafish demonstrates that these neurons emerge by 3 days postfertilisation and follow a trajectory where representations of small numerosities precede larger ones. Altogether, integrating genetic, behavioural and circuit-level approaches provides a powerful framework for uncovering conserved mechanisms of numerosity supporting higher-level cognitive functions, including mathematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.