Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015509›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2026

A primer on prime: A prime editing update from advances to first-in-human trial.

Caleb Lushington, Paul Thomas, Fatwa Adikusuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caleb LushingtonSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Electronic address: caleb.lushington@adelaide.edu.au.
Paul ThomasSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; South Australian Genome Editing (SAGE) Facility, SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Fatwa AdikusumaSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Electronic address: fatwa.adikusuma@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of CRISPR systems has transformed genome editing, offering unparalleled efficiency and versatility with wide therapeutic potential. However, conventional CRISPR systems face key limitations, including unpredictable and imprecise outcomes during repair of double-stranded breaks and reliance on specific protospacer adjacent motif sequences. In response, prime editing (PE) has emerged as a powerful alternative, enabling precise custom edits using a fusion of Cas9 nickase and an engineered reverse transcriptase (RT) together with a PE guide RNA (pegRNA) that encodes the desired repair template. PE enables edits to be installed at or downstream of the target site, expanding the range of targetable sequences. Since its inception, PE has undergone extensive optimization, including Cas variant selection, RT engineering, and pegRNA improvements. In parallel, advances in delivery, including nanoparticles and split viral systems, have accelerated translation across preclinical disease models. Notably, PE has now entered the clinic, with the first-in-human study reporting functional restoration with a promising safety profile to date. Here, we summarize recent mechanistic insights, architectural innovations, and therapeutic applications of PE and discuss the remaining challenges in efficiency, delivery, and safety that will shape broader clinical impact.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPRdual-pegRNAgenetic diseasegenome editingoff-target profilingpegRNAPE-integraseprime editingprime editing nuclease

Identifiers

PMID42015509
PMCPMC13239743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.