ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2026
A primer on prime: A prime editing update from advances to first-in-human trial.
Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas9 in Cancer Therapy: Overcoming Delivery Barriers and Off-Target Effects for Clinical Translation.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Advances in prime editing: Molecular innovations, Large-fragment engineering, and AI-driven design.Biodesign research · 2026Review
- Clinical translation of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics in cancer and inherited genetic disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of CRISPR systems has transformed genome editing, offering unparalleled efficiency and versatility with wide therapeutic potential. However, conventional CRISPR systems face key limitations, including unpredictable and imprecise outcomes during repair of double-stranded breaks and reliance on specific protospacer adjacent motif sequences. In response, prime editing (PE) has emerged as a powerful alternative, enabling precise custom edits using a fusion of Cas9 nickase and an engineered reverse transcriptase (RT) together with a PE guide RNA (pegRNA) that encodes the desired repair template. PE enables edits to be installed at or downstream of the target site, expanding the range of targetable sequences. Since its inception, PE has undergone extensive optimization, including Cas variant selection, RT engineering, and pegRNA improvements. In parallel, advances in delivery, including nanoparticles and split viral systems, have accelerated translation across preclinical disease models. Notably, PE has now entered the clinic, with the first-in-human study reporting functional restoration with a promising safety profile to date. Here, we summarize recent mechanistic insights, architectural innovations, and therapeutic applications of PE and discuss the remaining challenges in efficiency, delivery, and safety that will shape broader clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.