Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016265›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2026

Efficacy of Vitamin E Supplementation During Pregnancy on the Vitamin E Nutritional Status of the Mother-Child Dyad: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

Byanca Rodrigues Carneiro, Anny Cristine de Araújo, Yvi Melo Sisinano, Amanda Freitas de Oliveira, Adriana Augusto de Rezende, Karla Danielly da Silva Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Byanca Rodrigues CarneiroPostgraduate Program in Applied Sciences to Women's Health Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.
Anny Cristine de AraújoPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.
Yvi Melo SisinanoDepartment of Nutrition Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2007-0279
Amanda Freitas de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Nutrition Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.
Adriana Augusto de RezendePostgraduate Program in Health Sciences Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.
Karla Danielly da Silva RibeiroPostgraduate Program in Applied Sciences to Women's Health Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte Natal Rio Grande do Norte Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of vitamin E supplementation on maternal and neonatal vitamin E status. Studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin E supplementation in pregnant women with placebo were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were independently performed by reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Six RCTs including 3.823 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Vitamin E supplementation significantly increased maternal serum α-TOH concentrations (SMD = 4.89; 95% CI: 2.89-6.89;

Indexed as

alpha‐tocopherolclinical trialsmaternal‐child dyadmaternal healthmeta‐analysispregnancysupplementation

Identifiers

PMID42016265
PMCPMC13093448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.