Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016315›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Neural decision dynamics underlying reinforcement learning and working memory.

Mads L Pedersen, Erik R Frogner, Lars T Westlye, Torgeir Moberget

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mads L PedersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Erik R FrognerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars T WestlyeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torgeir MobergetCenter for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning relies on multiple cognitive mechanisms-including reinforcement learning (RL) and working memory (WM)-forming internal value representations guiding choice. However, it remains unclear how these values are transformed into choices, and how this transformation relates to RL and WM. We analyzed electroencephalography (EEG) data from 510 participants performing the RLWM task. An RLWM-linear ballistic accumulator (RLWM-LBA) model was applied, linking RL- and WM-derived policy estimates to evidence-accumulation dynamics. With model-derived event-related potential (ERP) analyses, we tested whether neural signatures of RL and WM persist when accounting for choice dynamics, and whether a neural evidence accumulation signal-the centro-parietal positivity (CPP)-emerges in a learning context. Our findings replicate distinct neural correlates for RL and WM and reveal a CPP signal reflecting uncertainty in learned value representations. CPP signals improve model fit and are differentially linked to RL and WM across cognitive load, supporting their role in shaping learning-related decision dynamics.

Indexed as

biological sciencesclinical neurosciencenatural sciencesneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42016315
PMCPMC13092874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.