ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Nanomedicine for Cardiac Repair in Heart Failure: From Targeted Delivery to Regenerative Modulation.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure is a progressive syndrome in which the heart fails to maintain adequate output and remains a leading cause of mortality and healthcare utilization despite guideline-directed pharmacological and device-based therapies. A major contributor to this residual burden is the limited myocardial specificity of conventional treatments, which act systemically and incompletely address the heterogeneous microenvironment of the failing ventricle. Nanomedicine employs nanoscale carriers to reshape pharmacokinetics, protect labile cargo, and enhance delivery to injured myocardium. Preclinical studies in predominantly heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) models, including post-myocardial infarction and pressure-overload injury, demonstrate that targeted nanoplatforms can improve left ventricular ejection fraction by approximately 5-15 percentage points, reduce infarct size by 20-50%, and attenuate fibrosis, inflammation, or cardiomyocyte apoptosis by 30-60% compared with control treatments. Spatially and temporally controlled delivery of small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids is possible using organic and inorganic nanoparticles and catalytic systems, biomimetic and bioderived carriers, extracellular vesicles, and nanostructured hydrogels or patches, with some also providing mechanical support or theranostic imaging. There is limited evidence in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Early studies have focused on inflammation, fibrosis, and microvascular dysfunction rather than on contractile recovery. Importantly, the majority of nanomedicine strategies discussed remain at the preclinical stage, with clinical experience largely confined to early-phase safety and feasibility studies. This review summarizes information from in vitro systems, small- and large-animal models, and newly developed clinical studies, and critically examines translational issues such as toxicity, immunogenicity, scalability, and regulatory complexity. New approaches to cardiac regeneration, such as local delivery of pro-regenerative signals, are also supported by nanomedicine, which facilitates the delivery of pro-regenerative cues, such as regulatory RNAs and extracellular vesicles, to promote cardiomyocyte survival, angiogenesis, and limited myocardial tissue renewal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.