ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2026
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Local Bone Grafting Combined with Implant Restoration in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Partial Edentulism.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of partial edentulism, which may lead to tooth loss, compromised masticatory function, and dietary restrictions. Delayed or inadequate treatment can cause complications and sequelae that severely reduce quality of life. This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of local bone grafting combined with implant restoration in diabetic patients with partial edentulism, to provide evidence for clinical treatment strategies. Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of local bone grafting combined with implant restoration in diabetic patients with partial edentulism. Methods: A total of 122 eligible patients were randomly divided into control and observation groups (n=61 each). The control group received conventional implant restoration, while the observation group underwent local autogenous bone grafting combined with implant restoration. Outcomes included peri-implant bone mineral density, new bone formation, bone-to-implant contact, inflammatory cytokines in peri-implant crevicular fluid, periodontal indicators, serum bone metabolic markers, and postoperative soft tissue complications. Results: Preoperative baseline values were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, the observation group exhibited significantly higher bone mineral density, new bone area percentage, and bone-to-implant contact, along with lower levels of TNF-α, IL-8, and IFN-γ. Periodontal status, implant stability, and bone metabolism markers were also improved, and the overall complication rate was significantly lower (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Local bone grafting combined with implant restoration effectively improves early implant stability and osseointegration, reduces inflammatory responses, and lowers the incidence of postoperative complications in diabetic patients with partial edentulism. The method is safe and effective and holds high clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.