Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016568›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2026

Restoring low-fiber diets-induced

Langqing Liu, Cineng Xu, Yiyi Liu, Jie Yang, Yong Ye, Zekai Yao, Danyang Lin, Haiqi Qiu, Donglin Ruan, Yibin Qiu and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Langqing LiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cineng XuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yiyi LiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jie YangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yong YeState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zekai YaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Danyang LinState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Haiqi QiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Donglin RuanState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yibin QiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiyuan WangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Meng LinState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zebin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sixiu HuangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fanming MengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Enqin ZhengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gengyuan CaiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhenfang WuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jia-Jin WuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals rely on their gut microbiota to degrade cellulose, the major component of dietary fiber. Westernized populations harbor a depleted microbiome with reduced fiber-digesting capacity and impaired immune regulation due to prolonged consumption of low-fiber diets. Comparable patterns are evident in other mammals, including Western commercial pigs raised on high-energy, low-fiber diets, exhibiting reduced diversity and abundance of fiber-degrading bacteria. In contrast, semi-free-ranging Chinese indigenous pigs consuming fiber-rich diets retain a more diverse and functionally resilient microbiota, reflecting divergent trajectories of host-microbiota co-evolution. However, the specific cellulose-degrading species lost and strategies to restore these functions remain unclear in mammals. By analyzing 473 human stool metagenomes spanning non-westernized and westernized diets, together with 251 fecal 16S rRNA datasets and 95 metagenomes from Western commercial pigs, Chinese indigenous pigs, and their crossbred progeny, we identified the

Indexed as

Anti-inflammatoryFiber digestionImmune statusLachnospiraceae bacteriumLow-fiber dietsProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID42016568
PMCPMC13092875

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.