Evidence mapPaperPMID 42016569Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2026

A comparative study of vision-language models for food ingredient recognition and nutrient estimation.

Shenglong Wang, Guorui Sheng, Hongfei Yan, Weiqing Min, Shuqiang Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shenglong WangSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai, 264025, China.
Guorui ShengSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai, 264025, China.
Hongfei YanSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Ludong University, Yantai, 264025, China.
Weiqing MinState Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Shuqiang JiangState Key Laboratory of AI Safety, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate assessment of food composition is essential to understanding its nutritional and sensory properties. Traditional dietary assessment methods are often constrained by subjective input and low reproducibility. This study explores the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for automated food composition analysis, focusing on two key tasks: food ingredient recognition and nutrient estimation. We evaluated state-of-the-art VLMs using the Nutrition5K dataset, which contains real-world food images with ingredient-level annotations. To improve model sensitivity to complex food structures, we introduce a progressive multi-view image recognition approach that enhances ingredient recognition. We also propose a prompting strategy using ingredient labels to guide nutrient estimation. Results show that while most VLMs effectively identify primary food components, challenges persist in quantifying nutrient contents, particularly for composite or visually ambiguous dishes. Our findings highlight the promise and limitations of AI-assisted food composition analysis and offer insights for future methods integrating chemical, visual, and computational perspectives.

Indexed as

Food ingredient recognitionNutrient estimationNutritional assessmentVision–Language Models

Identifiers

PMID42016569
PMCPMC13092701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.