Evidence mapPaperPMID 42017122Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2026

Vulnerability and Pediatric Pain.

S van Rysewyk, D Harrison, A Harvey, E Ilhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S van RysewykDepartment of Philosophy and Gender Studies School of Humanities, University of Tasmania Hobart Australia.
D HarrisonDepartment of Nursing School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.
A HarveyNeurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne Australia.
E IlhanSchool of Health Sciences and Nursing Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-0733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare disparities amplify vulnerabilities in infants and children. In the context of pain, vulnerable individuals are those whose pain often goes under-appreciated, -recognized, or -treated. Vulnerability to pain arises due to multiple and interacting sources including inherent vulnerability, situational vulnerability, and pathogenic vulnerability. Some groups are more vulnerable to pain than others, which will be the focus of this article: sick and preterm newborns, and children with intellectual disabilities and complex communication needs, including children with cerebral palsy. In this conceptual review, we highlight vulnerabilities to pain in these vulnerable populations and identify how we have obligations to minimize harm experienced by sick and preterm newborns, and children with developmental disabilities. Although pain is a universal experience, not everyone has equal and fair access to the necessary services for adequate pain management. This is particularly the case for sick and preterm babies who are exposed to large numbers of painful procedures during their hospitalization, and individuals with intellectual disability and complex communication needs, who have limited language and/or speech capacity to self-report pain. Therefore, explicit reflection on vulnerability reinforces a collective responsibility to provide effective assessment and management of pain in particularly vulnerable pediatric populations.

Indexed as

cerebral palsycommunication needsintellectual disabilityneonatepainpreterm babyvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID42017122
PMCPMC13094359

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.