Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Petrelintide for Weight Management: Two Randomized, Controlled Phase 1 Trials.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPetrelintide is a long-acting amylin analogue in development for weight management. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of petrelintide were evaluated in single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) trials. MATERIALS AND
methodsBoth trials were randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. The SAD trial assessed subcutaneous (SC) petrelintide doses of 0.04-2.4 mg and a 0.35 mg intravenous dose. The MAD trial evaluated 6 once-weekly SC doses of 0.6 and 1.2 mg (part 1), and 16 once-weekly doses escalated every 2 weeks to target doses of 2.4, 4.8, and 9.0 mg (part 2). The SAD and MAD part 1 trials enrolled normal or overweight adults; MAD part 2 enrolled adults with overweight or obesity.
resultsPetrelintide was well tolerated, with no serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In both trials, the most common TEAEs included gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, most of which were mild. One participant discontinued treatment due to GI TEAEs. Nausea, the most common GI TEAE, occurred in 16.7%-33.3% of participants receiving petrelintide versus 16.7% for placebo in MAD part 2, while diarrhoea was rare and vomiting was only experienced by the participant who discontinued. Petrelintide was slowly absorbed, had a half-life of ~10 days, showed steady-state dose proportionality, and reduced body weight by up to 8.6% after 16 weeks.
conclusionPetrelintide appeared safe, had a low incidence of GI TEAEs, and resulted in clinically relevant weight loss. These findings support further development of petrelintide as an effective weight-management medication, with potential for improved GI tolerability over existing therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.