ReviewThe Biochemical journal2026
Revisiting RAS family GTPase signaling: effector selectivity and oncogenic bypass.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Language Model Embeddings Recover Evolutionary and Functional Organization Across the Ras Superfamily.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- A Clinical and Molecular Comparative Analysis of KRAS Exon 2 and KRAS Non-Exon 2 Mutated Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinct effector-binding preferences among RAS family GTPases challenge the longstanding view that canonical RAS proteins uniformly bind and activate RAF, PI3Kα, RalGDS, and other downstream effectors. Quantitative binding data, supported by structural insights into effector recognition, instead reveal a division of labor: the canonical RAS subfamily (KRAS, HRAS, NRAS) binds RAF kinases with high affinity, the RRAS subfamily (RRAS2 and MRAS) preferentially engages PI3Kα, and the RAP subfamily (RAP1A and RAP1B) shows the strongest binding to RalGDS. These intrinsic preferences, encoded in the switch regions and further shaped by isoform and effector expression, as well as subcellular localization, establish a hierarchy in which canonical RAS, RRAS2/MRAS, and RAP1A/B primarily activate RAF, PI3Kα, and RalGDS, respectively, in normal cells. Oncogenic mutations at codons G12, G13, or Q61 disrupt this hierarchy by driving sustained accumulation of GTP-bound canonical RAS, enabling engagement of lower-affinity effectors such as PI3Kα and RalGDS. In addition, certain mutations, including KRAS-G12D and -G12V, modestly enhance PI3Kα binding, representing a neomorphic expansion of effector engagement. Together, these effects bypass intrinsic effector selectivity, allowing canonical RAS to co-opt effectors normally associated with other RAS subfamilies and broaden downstream signaling. This framework explains how inherent effector preferences govern normal signaling and how oncogenic mutations override these constraints to expand effector engagement in RAS-driven cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.