Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017408›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Thailand's Aging Society: Reconsidering Policy and Innovation Readiness for Elderly Care.

Sopak Supakul, Pichaya Toyoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sopak SupakulFujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5835-2437
Pichaya ToyodaCELUVI Academy Japan, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thailand has entered an aging society ahead of its economic readiness, with demographic pressures outpacing the capacity of existing health and social systems. Although the universal coverage scheme and the national long-term care (LTC) initiative provide an important policy foundation, elderly care remains fragmented across ministries, unevenly implemented, and heavily reliant on unpaid or undertrained community caregivers. This commentary synthesizes current evidence through 2025 and identifies key system gaps, including low utilization of local-level funds, shortages of trained personnel, and weak inter-ministerial coordination across the health, welfare, and local government sectors. Recent developments, such as community-based LTC models, expanded telehealth services, and Thailand's emerging regulatory framework for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), illustrate the country's growing innovation readiness, though major challenges remain. Digital platforms for chronic disease monitoring and post-stroke rehabilitation show early promise, whereas ATMPs require careful evaluation through health technology assessment, ethical oversight, and long-term cost-effectiveness considerations. As Thailand moves toward becoming a super-aged society, strategic reforms in financing, workforce development, digital infrastructure, and ATMP regulatory preparedness are essential. Without coordinated efforts, the country faces the risk of "aging before prosperity" and increasing care disparities. However, with strengthened collaboration and the careful implementation of existing initiatives and emerging technologies, Thailand can build an elderly care system that truly supports healthy and dignified aging.

Indexed as

AgingHealth PolicyHealth Services for the AgedLong-Term CareAgedHumansTelemedicineThailandaging societyATMPselderly carelong-term carepolicyThailand

Identifiers

PMID42017408
PMCPMC13111867

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.