ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Local Pain Collectives: A Novel Strategy for Improving Pain Knowledge, Pain Care and Community Connectedness in Rural Settings.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laying the Foundations for Co-Design: A Micro-Community Engagement Approach to Patient and Public Involvement in Rural Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo present key discussion points from a workshop where attendees reflected on personal and professional development achievements gained through their involvement in Pain Revolution's 'Local Pain Collectives' program.
designReflexive thematic analysis of notes written by workshop attendees and key points discussed during workshop activities.
settingAn in-person workshop was held in Melbourne, Victoria.
participantsA cohort of Pain Revolution Local Pain Collective facilitators, their mentors and Pain Revolution's executive team.
resultsTwenty-eight meeting attendees (19 facilitators, six mentors and three executive team members). Facilitators reported gaining increased knowledge of contemporary pain science, greater confidence communicating with other healthcare providers and improved interactions with their patients. Further, they related that their local collective members reported similar improvements in their understanding of pain and their patient interactions. They described that their collectives enabled new professional connections, enhanced a sense of belonging to a community of like-minded healthcare providers and increased collaborative pain care in their communities.
conclusionsThe increased connection, sense of belonging to a community of like-minded healthcare providers, and formation of collaborative care networks are all important program impacts given the lack of existing literature regarding interventions targeting professional isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.